Oral Trial Ordered for Grido Owners
Sourse: dairynews.today
The owners of Grido face an oral trial over illicit fiscal association charges, impacting their reputation and the sector.
The Federal Chamber of Penal Cassation has made a significant reversal in the case involving the Santiago family, owners of the famous Grido ice cream brand. Oscar Lucas Santiago (father), Lucas Santiago, and Sebastián Oscar Santiago will now face an oral trial for illicit fiscal association. This overturns the previous dismissal issued in August 2024 by the Federal Oral Court No. 2 of Córdoba, reopening an investigation into alleged illicit fiscal maneuvers carried out between 2007 and 2012.
The accusation highlights a complex organization alleged to commit tax crimes, including various stages of ice cream production, distribution, and franchise operations. The case underscores the scope of alleged tax evasion and its potential economic damage to the Argentine treasury. The previous dismissal was based on interpreting the Law of Regularization 27.743, but this new ruling emphasizes that such a law does not cover illicit fiscal association. This decision could create a legal precedent, stressing that severe offenses cannot be exempted through tax regularization.
The trial against Grido's leadership could significantly impact their market reputation and consumer trust. It also sets a critical precedent for other companies, highlighting the judiciary's stance on applying regularization laws and pursuing fiscal crimes. This case underlines the importance of fiscal transparency and corporate governance in large-scale industries.
The accusation highlights a complex organization alleged to commit tax crimes, including various stages of ice cream production, distribution, and franchise operations. The case underscores the scope of alleged tax evasion and its potential economic damage to the Argentine treasury. The previous dismissal was based on interpreting the Law of Regularization 27.743, but this new ruling emphasizes that such a law does not cover illicit fiscal association. This decision could create a legal precedent, stressing that severe offenses cannot be exempted through tax regularization.
The trial against Grido's leadership could significantly impact their market reputation and consumer trust. It also sets a critical precedent for other companies, highlighting the judiciary's stance on applying regularization laws and pursuing fiscal crimes. This case underlines the importance of fiscal transparency and corporate governance in large-scale industries.
